Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Received: from [65.33.167.109] (account marv@lancaironline.net)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.1.4)
  with HTTP id 2606604 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 27 Sep 2003 23:49:56 -0400
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: intake tubing?
To: flyrotary
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.1.4
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 23:49:56 -0400
Message-ID: <web-2606604@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <00eb01c38572$293745c0$0000a398@Carol>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Posted for "sqpilot@earthlink" <sqpilot@earthlink.net>:

If I recall correctly, Racing Beat's 900 HP engine used hose to join 
the aluminum intake runners, as did Mechanair? Paul Conner

>>>  Has anyone considered using really heavy hose for the runners, rather than 
something ridged like aluminum, or fiberglass? <<<