X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from elasmtp-spurfowl.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.66] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1c.3) with ESMTP id 1344347 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 06:07:29 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.66; envelope-from=Dastaten@earthlink.net Received: from [24.238.204.100] (helo=[192.168.0.3]) by elasmtp-spurfowl.atl.sa.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1GFpdJ-0007FZ-Mm for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 06:06:49 -0400 Message-ID: <44EC28C9.2030107@earthlink.net> Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 05:07:05 -0500 From: David Staten User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] renesis recall? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: 9a30bff84e6cb88f95c85d38d22416599ef193a6bfc3dd482239bd115e01e848209f38970d452b6a3d063210bc784f5e350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 24.238.204.100 Todd Archer wrote: > Heard a rumor on Denver TV of a complete Renesis recall for all RX8's > ('04-06) but can't find any web confirmation. Anyone hear that? > > > > Todd Archer > > > CONFIRMED. However.. may be NO FACTOR for our application. Some cars were having the cat converters go bad due to oil leaks in the engine. Uncertain how bad the leaks actually are (and remember the engine sprays oil into the combustion chamber, so it must not all be burning, apparently).. or if they are leaks at all, as opposed to just design issues with oil injection. Again. We dont have cat converters on the engine, so other than a little smudge on the tailpipe or prop (pushers) I would't sweat it. Dave *Source: Automotive News Automaker: Engines failing vacuum test must be replaced MONTEREY, Calif.* -- After suffering a black eye from disclosing that it won't count RX-8 owners' opinions in its internal customer-satisfaction scores, Mazda says it may have to replace the engines in many of its flagship sports cars. The voluntary recall of all 2004 and 2005 vehicles, and some 2006s, is expected to be announced this week or next. It involves damage to the catalyst resulting from oil leaks in the RX-8's rotary engine. Any engine that does not pass a vacuum test must be replaced, said Robert Davis, head of product development and quality at Mazda North American Operations. Engines prone to failing the test are mostly in hot climates and use synthetic oils. Mazda also will check each RX-8's battery and starter, which tend to fail in cold climates. "We're going to give these cars the white-glove treatment," Davis said. "We would rather replace the engine than have the dealer crack them open." Davis would not disclose the projected failure rate of the engines or the cost to replace them. Mazda has a remanufacturing center in North Carolina that will rebuild faulty engines and return them to service. The recall comes after a video Webcast by two dealers who attended the July 11-13 National Dealer Advisory Council meetings in Newport Beach, Calif., was leaked on the Internet. In the video, dealers said problems with the RX-8 were unfairly lowering Mazda customer-satisfaction scores. Mazda informed the dealers that RX-8 owners would continue to be surveyed, but that the responses would not factor into dealer customer-satisfaction scores. *See story here* Mazda has issued service bulletins on such trouble spots as squeaky brakes and engine flooding.