X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from ms-smtp-03.southeast.rr.com ([24.25.9.102] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1c.3) with ESMTP id 1330443 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 07:52:07 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=24.25.9.102; envelope-from=eanderson@carolina.rr.com Received: from edward2 (cpe-024-074-111-186.carolina.res.rr.com [24.74.111.186]) by ms-smtp-03.southeast.rr.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k7EBpHPP008457 for ; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 07:51:18 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <000901c6bf98$6632d760$2402a8c0@edward2> From: "Ed Anderson" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Emailing: DoorOpenLside.jpg Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 07:54:29 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0006_01C6BF76.DED4EC20" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0006_01C6BF76.DED4EC20 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Jarrett, Actually, I believe that if the hose breaks anywhere the pressure will = drop everywhere and the two cylinders will both lower (more or less) = together. I could be wrong about that, but until an hydraulic expert = tells me otherwise, that is what my eyeball analysis indicates to me. Ed ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Jarrett & Heidi Johnson=20 To: Rotary motors in aircraft=20 Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 12:11 AM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Emailing: DoorOpenLside.jpg Ed, looks like you have it well in hand.. any plan however, for a hose = break [or leak over time] which would lower one cylinder but not the = other? Jarrett ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Ed Anderson=20 To: Rotary motors in aircraft=20 Sent: Sunday, August 13, 2006 9:52 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Emailing: DoorOpenLside.jpg Good Idea, Lynn. Screw the hose in one side of the aluminum block, = up flow pushes through the restrictor and check valve, back flow closes = check valve and only flows through restrictor. Shouldn't be that hard = to make. Thanks Ed ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Lehanover@aol.com=20 To: Rotary motors in aircraft=20 Sent: Sunday, August 13, 2006 11:36 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Emailing: DoorOpenLside.jpg In a message dated 8/13/2006 11:04:01 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, = eanderson@carolina.rr.com writes: Not a bad idea, Ben. They would slow down the opening a bit, = but would probably slow down the closing even more. I'll check into it. Ed Assemble a swing check valve in parallel with your restrictor. So, = most of the up flow is unrestricted and any downflow closes the check = valve and goes through the restrictor. Or machine the whole thing in a small block of aluminum. Lynn E. Hanover -------------------------------------------------------------------------= --- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.10.9/417 - Release Date: = 8/11/2006 ------=_NextPart_000_0006_01C6BF76.DED4EC20 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Jarrett,
 
Actually, I believe that if the hose breaks=20 anywhere the pressure will drop = everywhere and=20 the two cylinders will both lower (more or less) together.  I could = be=20 wrong about that, but until an hydraulic expert tells me otherwise, that = is what=20 my eyeball analysis indicates to me.
 
Ed
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Jarrett=20 & Heidi Johnson
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 = 12:11=20 AM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: = Emailing:=20 DoorOpenLside.jpg

Ed, looks like you have it well in hand.. any plan however, for a = hose=20 break [or leak over time] which would lower one cylinder but not the=20 other?
 
Jarrett
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Ed Anderson
To: Rotary motors in = aircraft=20
Sent: Sunday, August 13, 2006 = 9:52=20 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: = Emailing:=20 DoorOpenLside.jpg

Good Idea, Lynn.  Screw the hose in one = side of the=20 aluminum block, up flow pushes through the restrictor and check = valve, back=20 flow closes check valve and only flows through = restrictor.  =20 Shouldn't be that hard to make.
 
Thanks
 
Ed
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Lehanover@aol.com
To: Rotary motors in = aircraft=20
Sent: Sunday, August 13, = 2006 11:36=20 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: = Emailing:=20 DoorOpenLside.jpg

In a message dated 8/13/2006 11:04:01 P.M. Eastern Daylight = Time, eanderson@carolina.rr.com=20 writes:
Not a bad idea, Ben.  They would = slow down=20 the opening a bit, but would probably slow down the closing even = more.  I'll check into it.
 
Ed
Assemble a swing check valve in parallel with your = restrictor. So,=20 most of the up flow is unrestricted and any downflow closes the = check=20 valve and goes through the restrictor.
Or machine the whole thing in a small block of = aluminum.
 
Lynn E. Hanover

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG = Free=20 Edition.
Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.10.9/417 - = Release Date:=20 8/11/2006
------=_NextPart_000_0006_01C6BF76.DED4EC20--