Return-Path: Received: from fed1mtao01.cox.net ([68.6.19.244] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.4) with ESMTP id 2602075 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 15:14:44 -0400 Received: from BigAl ([68.107.116.221]) by fed1mtao01.cox.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with ESMTP id <20030924191441.CSDN3568.fed1mtao01.cox.net@BigAl> for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 15:14:41 -0400 From: "Al Gietzen" To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: DIE the short Answer Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 12:14:53 -0700 Message-ID: <001201c382d0$227b9a00$6400a8c0@BigAl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0013_01C38295.761CC200" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4024 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0013_01C38295.761CC200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In any case, the EDDIE study indicated that for my system that combining the primary and secondary runners after they exit the block not only would probably not hurt things, it might help. Well, it certainly simplified the tube alignment problem and we will see about its affect (if any) on performance. This puzzles me, and maybe I missed some prior part of this discussion; but how do avoid getting a wave reflection; degradation or whatever at the junction of two into one? Al ------=_NextPart_000_0013_01C38295.761CC200 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message

 

In any case, the EDDIE = study indicated that for my system that combining the primary and secondary = runners after they exit the block not only would probably not hurt things, it = might help.  Well, it certainly simplified the tube alignment problem and = we will see about its affect (if any) on performance.

 

This puzzles me, and maybe I missed some prior part of this discussion; but how do = avoid getting a wave reflection; degradation or whatever at the junction of = two into one?

 

Al

------=_NextPart_000_0013_01C38295.761CC200--