Message

Return-Path: <13brv3@bellsouth.net> Received: from imf23aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.71] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.4) with ESMTP id 2601900 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 13:47:08 -0400 Received: from rad ([68.212.12.251]) by imf23aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.05.27 201-253-122-126-127-20021220) with ESMTP id <20030924174703.MOVW20055.imf23aec.mail.bellsouth.net@rad> for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 13:47:03 -0400 From: "Russell Duffy" <13brv3@bellsouth.net> To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: DIE the short Answer Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 12:47:03 -0500 Message-ID: <000001c382c3$dd172120$0201a8c0@rad> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0001_01C38299.F4411920" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C38299.F4411920 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In any case, the EDDIE study indicated that for my system that combining the primary and secondary runners after they exit the block not only would probably not hurt things, it might help. Well, it certainly simplified the tube alignment problem and we will see about its affect (if any) on performance. That's good to hear. I think Paul more or less asked before if this would work, and I never saw the answer. He's got a small intake, that brings the primary and secondary together quickly, then he's going to extend that to his throttle body. I may very well do the same thing when it comes time to de-uglify my cowl. It just seems like 2 runners are easier to deal with than 4. Cheers, Rusty ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C38299.F4411920 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message

In any case, the EDDIE study indicated = that for my=20 system that combining the primary and secondary runners after they exit = the=20 block not only would probably not hurt things, it might help. = Well, it=20 certainly simplified the tube alignment problem and we will see about = its affect=20 (if any) on performance.

That's good=20 to hear. I think Paul more or less asked before if this = would=20 work, and I never saw the answer. He's got a small intake, = that=20 brings the primary and secondary together quickly, then he's going to = extend=20 that to his throttle body. I may very well do the same thing when=20 it comes time to de-uglify my cowl. It just seems like 2 = runners are=20 easier to deal with than 4.

Cheers,

Rusty

------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C38299.F4411920--