Return-Path: <sladerj@bellsouth.net>
Received: from imf19aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.67] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.4)
  with ESMTP id 2601598 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 09:12:22 -0400
Received: from TOSHIBAjhr ([209.215.55.50]) by imf19aec.mail.bellsouth.net
          (InterMail vM.5.01.05.27 201-253-122-126-127-20021220) with SMTP
          id <20030924131221.QEGH1849.imf19aec.mail.bellsouth.net@TOSHIBAjhr>
          for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>;
          Wed, 24 Sep 2003 09:12:21 -0400
From: "John Slade" <sladerj@bellsouth.net>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: DIE the short Answer
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 09:12:19 -0400
Message-ID: <NMELKLCBIAJLEHHCHLJBGEKDCJAA.sladerj@bellsouth.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
In-Reply-To: <list-2601577@logan.com>

Eddie,
Help me out here. I really AM having my plenum made this week.
If I design a U shaped plenum with an internal baffle to bounce the
primaries, where would be a good place for the throttle body? I'm thinking
underneath, overlapping the internal baffle, with about an inch of "space"
to allow the air to split between the runners. I'm concerned that the baffle
might tend to split the air unequally. Perhaps I'd be better off without a
baffle, and just use the EDDIE on the secondaries. Any thoughts?
John Slade