Received-SPF: softfail
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.102.122.148; envelope-from=echristley@nc.rr.com
Message-ID: <44B669C0.90106@nc.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 11:41:52 -0400
From: Ernest Christley <echristley@nc.rr.com>
Reply-To: echristley@nc.rr.com
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.4.1 (X11/20050929)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: heater
References: <list-1235303@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-1235303@logan.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Lehanover@aol.com wrote:

> In a message dated 7/13/2006 10:20:03 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, 
> echristley@nc.rr.com writes:
>
>     I'm planning a sliding door to cut the airflow through the
>     strake mounted ducts, so it probably won't matter.  I can get the
>     temps
>     up quickly on either one.  But I still think the oil will get hotter
>     faster than the water.
>
> Although it can be very uncomfortable, you can save a runaway over 
> temp by turning on the cabin heater full blast. Might even save your 
> bacon. If you have the muffler sleeve style heater no such option 
> exists. Plus the monoxide threat is much reduced.
>  
> Lynn E. Hanover
>  
>  

Not really an option in my case Lynn.  The main radiator will provide my 
cabin heat.

-- 
         ,|"|"|,              Ernest Christley       |
----===<{{(oQo)}}>===----    Dyke Delta Builder      |
        o|  d  |o        http://ernest.isa-geek.org  |