Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #30086
From: Ed Anderson <eanderson@carolina.rr.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Six port bolt-on manfold progress (was: RX-8)
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 10:34:11 -0500
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Your right, Bob.  Older is not necessarily bad {:>).  Although in my case, the piece of  broken apex seal actually wiped out the seal behind it before departing - but depart it did.  I agree, no chance of it continuing to rattle around to do who knows what damage. 
 
Ed
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 9:25 AM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Six port bolt-on manfold progress (was: RX-8)

Ed, keep in mind that you older 13B has some advantages over the renises. If for any reason you blow out an apex seal, which has happened now and then, you old 13b will just spit it out the exhaust port. The renesis....who knows where its going....just round and round until it seizes the entire engine? 
 
Bob Mears
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Ed Anderson <eanderson@carolina.rr.com>
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Wed, 8 Feb 2006 23:26:20 -0500
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Six port bolt-on manfold progress (was: RX-8)

Having the older 13B, which was redline in the auto at 7500 rpm, I would certainly not feel comfortable with a higher rpm under continuous operation.  Now, with lightened rotors and dynamic balancing, I might reconsider {:>)
 
Ed
----- Original Message -----
From: rijakits
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 6:34 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Six port bolt-on manfold progress (was: RX-8)

 
I am rooting for his success - naturally I would only run 8000 rpm with his intake on my older 13B, but I would be happy with that {:>)
 
Ed.
 
Why not 9000 rpm?
 
Thomas J. ("TJ")
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster