X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from [24.25.9.102] (HELO ms-smtp-03-eri0.southeast.rr.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.8) with ESMTP id 975878 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 09 Feb 2006 10:34:52 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=24.25.9.102; envelope-from=eanderson@carolina.rr.com Received: from edward2 (cpe-024-074-025-165.carolina.res.rr.com [24.74.25.165]) by ms-smtp-03-eri0.southeast.rr.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id k19FY3qi024407 for ; Thu, 9 Feb 2006 10:34:05 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <000e01c62d8e$47145a80$2402a8c0@edward2> From: "Ed Anderson" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Six port bolt-on manfold progress (was: RX-8) Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 10:34:11 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000B_01C62D64.5D8B7D40" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_000B_01C62D64.5D8B7D40 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Your right, Bob. Older is not necessarily bad {:>). Although in my = case, the piece of broken apex seal actually wiped out the seal behind = it before departing - but depart it did. I agree, no chance of it = continuing to rattle around to do who knows what damage.=20 Ed ----- Original Message -----=20 From: bmears9413@aol.com=20 To: Rotary motors in aircraft=20 Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 9:25 AM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Six port bolt-on manfold progress (was: RX-8) Ed, keep in mind that you older 13B has some advantages over the = renises. If for any reason you blow out an apex seal, which has happened = now and then, you old 13b will just spit it out the exhaust port. The = renesis....who knows where its going....just round and round until it = seizes the entire engine?=20 Bob Mears =20 -----Original Message----- From: Ed Anderson To: Rotary motors in aircraft Sent: Wed, 8 Feb 2006 23:26:20 -0500 Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Six port bolt-on manfold progress (was: RX-8) Having the older 13B, which was redline in the auto at 7500 rpm, I = would certainly not feel comfortable with a higher rpm under continuous = operation. Now, with lightened rotors and dynamic balancing, I might = reconsider {:>) Ed ----- Original Message -----=20 From: rijakits=20 To: Rotary motors in aircraft=20 Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 6:34 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Six port bolt-on manfold progress (was: = RX-8) I am rooting for his success - naturally I would only run 8000 rpm = with his intake on my older 13B, but I would be happy with that {:>) Ed. Why not 9000 rpm? Thomas J. ("TJ") ------=_NextPart_000_000B_01C62D64.5D8B7D40 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Your right, Bob.  Older is not necessarily = bad=20 {:>).  Although in my case, the piece of  broken apex seal = actually=20 wiped out the seal behind it before departing - but depart it did.  = I=20 agree, no chance of it continuing to rattle around to do who knows what=20 damage. 
 
Ed
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 bmears9413@aol.com
Sent: Thursday, February 09, = 2006 9:25=20 AM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Six = port bolt-on=20 manfold progress (was: RX-8)

Ed, keep in mind that you older 13B has some advantages over the = renises. If for any reason you = blow out an=20 apex seal, which has happened now and then, you old 13b will just spit = it out=20 the exhaust port. The renesis....who knows=20 where its going....just round and round until it seizes the entire engine? 
 
Bob Mears
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Ed = Anderson=20 <eanderson@carolina.rr.com>
To: Rotary motors in = aircraft=20 <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Wed, 8 Feb = 2006 23:26:20=20 -0500
Subject: [FlyRotary] = Re: Six port=20 bolt-on manfold progress (was: = RX-8)

Having the older 13B, which was redline in the auto at 7500 rpm, I would certainly not feel comfortable with a = higher rpm under continuous = operation.  Now, with=20 lightened rotors and dynamic balancing, I might reconsider=20 {:>)
 
Ed
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 rijakits
To: Rota= ry=20 motors in aircraft
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, = 2006 6:34=20 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Six = port=20 bolt-on manfold progress (was: RX-8)

 
I am rooting for his success - naturally I = would=20 only run 8000 rpm with his = intake on=20 my older 13B, but I would be happy with that {:>)
 
Ed.
 
Why not 9000 rpm?
 
Thomas J. ("TJ")
------=_NextPart_000_000B_01C62D64.5D8B7D40--