X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from [24.25.9.101] (HELO ms-smtp-02-eri0.southeast.rr.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.8) with ESMTP id 974192 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 07 Feb 2006 20:19:52 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=24.25.9.101; envelope-from=eanderson@carolina.rr.com Received: from edward2 (cpe-024-074-025-165.carolina.res.rr.com [24.74.25.165]) by ms-smtp-02-eri0.southeast.rr.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id k181J5Jl013024 for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2006 20:19:07 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <001301c62c4d$aa51cf70$2402a8c0@edward2> From: "Ed Anderson" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Why?? Re: [FlyRotary] RX-8 Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 20:19:10 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine That's certainly interesting, Randy, in that the 6 port and 4 port Rx-8 engine both use identical internal parts. True the induction system and port openings on the castings is different due to the number of ports - similar to the difference between the older 13B six port and 4 port turbo engines. While the 6 port will reportedly produce higher HP, its only when you get up into the 8500+ rpm range that is true. Then the better high rpm breathing of the 6 port induction system gives it an edge in producing power. However, I know of no one who has exceeded 7500 rpm in aircraft application at this point. Tracy Crook as probably a couple hundred hours on a 4 port . I believe his conclusion was that the complexity of the six port intake Vs its potential adaptation for aircraft use made the 4 port preferable. In any case, hard to understand why one engine would be junk when it shares the same design and parts as the other engine - sure would like to know some particulars about it. Ed ----- Original Message ----- From: "randy echtinaw" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 7:17 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] RX-8 > Gentlemen, > I have the opportunity to purchase a 4 port or a 6 port RX-8 engine. I > thought I wanted a 4 port because I thought it would be easier to muffel. > I just heard a "rumor" that the 4 port is junk and go with the 6 port. I > need 220-230 hp using the 2.85 PSRU, no turbo. I would consider P-porting > if absolutely necessary to get the HP. Obviously, I know very little > about engines and want to start with the best I can get so, considering > my needs which one do I want? > Thank you, > Randy > > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/ >