Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #3002
From: Tracy Crook <lors01@msn.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Good news, Bad news
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 11:21:07 -0400
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Message
Hi Rusty,
This performance gap you are seeing is a real mystery.  I can think of no one answer that explains it all so it's probably a combination of factors.    Here's my best SWAG:
 
1.  The BUC is draggy, even worse than we thought (but doesn't really explain the lousy climb rate)
 
2.  The Warp Drive prop is never going to be an optimum high speed stick.  (but hell, you're not even to moderate speed yet)  My gut feel is that you should be running at least 17 degrees at tip.  Anything less than 16 is a waste of time unless you are resigned to flying a draggy RV-3 which I'm sure you are not.  This is assuming about a 68 - 69" prop length.
 
3.  Your CG is near the fwd. limit which generates a LOT of trim drag.
 
4.  You may be underestimating the effect of gearleg  & wheel fairings (I think you mentioned you don't have them yet)   I found that I could not make ANY final decisions on airframe/engine performance, prop pitch or even cooling until these were in place.
 
Turbo stuff:
I have no turbo experience but my best guess is that the air temp sensor should be up-wind of the turbo.  Let the MAP table programming take care of the temp rise due to adabiatic (Sp?) heating from the turbo.  This should work at low levels of boost like you are running and will eliminate the big mixture difference between A & B controllers.  With this setup in a worst case scenario, the mixture might go too rich at high boost,  a much better thing than too lean. 
 
Tracy
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster