Received-SPF: softfail
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=171.71.176.72; envelope-from=echristley@nc.rr.com
Message-ID: <43B43382.5080304@nc.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:05:38 -0500
From: Ernest Christley <echristley@nc.rr.com>
Reply-To: echristley@nc.rr.com
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050317)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Unobtainium seals?
References: <list-905340@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-905340@logan.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Ed Anderson wrote:

>         True, the seals are made of unobtainium : ) But it gets worse.
>         Will soon introduce nitrided unobtainium seals. This is in
>         response to the drag racing maniacs running 30+ pounds of
>         boost with occasional detonation. The seals still don’t break
>         but they can be bent downward in the middle when at high
>         temperature and detonation slams them down, bottoming them out
>         on the spring seats. The nitrided seals retain their strength
>         at higher temps.
>         Tracy
>         Does this mean we can now run safely without coolant? {:>)
>         Ed A
>
Just you, Ed. The rest of us don't have enough glider time to get a 
sign-off 8*)

-- 
         ,|"|"|,                                    |
----===<{{(oQo)}}>===----        Dyke Delta         |
        o|  d  |o          www.ernest.isa-geek.org  |