Hi
Ed;
I know that it has been stated in the past, but refresh my
memory. Have you observed any fuel consumption change from the 2.17 to the
2.85????
Todd (tough game tonight, so too tired to check the
archives)
Also looking at the power difference at the two
different rpms, I calculate 160 at 5200 and 180HP at 6000, whether that
is accurate absolute power it shows a possible 12.5% increase. The
disc area carved out by the 74" prop is approx 18% more although its
speed is approx 13% less. So I think more area, more HP and more
pitch appears to add up in my case to considerably better low speed
performance. The top speed appears not to have changed, still a shade
under 200 MPH around 197MPH for both props.
|