|
Hi Bernie,
Good point, Yes, you are correct the engine mount is still
the same. However, since it only causes 1/2 ball deflection in cruise, I
not certain that the mount is that far offset in the wrong direction.
Guess I should add a few washers and find out - just kidding. One of my
numerous projects is to fabricate some new engine mounting brackets (keeping the
same mounting frame) with the offset to the opposite side.
Besides, its really the increased ROC that really tells
the story. I consistently get over 1500 fpm and even get up into the 1700
fpm range on cold days lightly loaded. Previously it was in the 1000-1200
fpm range.
Ok on the prop, Bernie.
I'm planning at this time to fly out to Bill Eslick flyin
in Feb weather permitting - make a nice long flight for your 9.
Ed A
===========================================
Hi Ed,
Don't forget to add that the P-factor is now in the opposite
direction and I believe you did not change angle of engine mount to offset
this. I'm not questioning that you get more thrust with this set
up, just questioning if your criteria of lack of rudder is a
good indicator.
Took your prop and the sensenich to plant city and left both with
them. Will probably be able to pick them up on the way home from Memphis
after Christmas.
Cheers and Merry Christmas in NC,
Bernie
|