Return-Path: Received: from fed1mtao04.cox.net ([68.6.19.241] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.3) with ESMTP id 2570637 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 07 Sep 2003 12:37:55 -0400 Received: from Leonards ([68.111.228.182]) by fed1mtao04.cox.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.04 201-253-122-130-104-20030726) with ESMTP id <20030907163754.HSJG21752.fed1mtao04.cox.net@Leonards> for ; Sun, 7 Sep 2003 12:37:54 -0400 From: "David Leonard" To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: water flow restrictor Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2003 09:37:56 -0700 Message-ID: <000701c3755e$64514850$b6e46f44@Leonards> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.3416 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 > -----Original Message----- > From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On > Behalf Of Al Gietzen > Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2003 8:43 AM > To: Rotary motors in aircraft > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: water flow restrictor > > Subject: [FlyRotary] water flow restrictor > > Although I would probably prefer to run a thermostat, my water pump > housing lost the ability to house a thermostat when it got chopped down > to size. Do I need to put in a restrictor? If so, how big should the > opening be? > > David Leonard > > Putting flow restriction in an aircraft application where you want > minimum radiator size and weight is a bad thing; in my opinion, of > course. The more flow the better - gives a lower temperature drop > across the radiator, therefore higher average radiator for the same temp > going back to the engine. > > The idea of a flow restrictor is to provide higher pressure in the > block, therefore increasing the boiling point somewhat; and provides > back pressure to the pump which may reduce the risk of cavitation at > very high rpm (like over 6000). If you don't mind a larger radiator, > OK. > > Size the radiator for about a 30F drop from inlet to outlet. Let the > radiator provide the back pressure in the loop, maybe take advantage of > double pass. > > Al Thanks for the advise, Al. I understand about using the smallest rad that will work, but that still doesn't address the issue of increased boiling point (for micro bubbles I assume) or cavitatation. Are these an important issue??? I do have a double pass thin rad, not sure if it will provide enough restriction Also, the water supply for the turbo comes from the block and I'm afraid that if I remove the restriction of the thermostat then the flow through the turbo will be reduced. I guess no one can answer these Q's for me for sure... I'll just say 'experimental' 3 times.. Thanks David Leonard The Rotary Roster: http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/rotaryroster/index.html