X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from mail19.syd.optusnet.com.au ([211.29.132.200] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.6) with ESMTPS id 613097 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 21:29:34 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=211.29.132.200; envelope-from=lendich@optusnet.com.au Received: from george (d211-31-217-122.dsl.nsw.optusnet.com.au [211.31.217.122]) by mail19.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id j6O1ShLc025119 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:28:46 +1000 Message-ID: <000901c58fef$2645ee00$7ad91fd3@george> From: "George Lendich" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] TES "O" Rings Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:29:33 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0006_01C59042.F7393550" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0006_01C59042.F7393550 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Kelly, Maybe at this present point in time, but who knows down the track. BTW one size I omitted for the inner "O" ring was the .093" which was = approx 1 : .77 - good for that size recess, I thought by just looking at = it,it would be too small ( thin), which Bill identified as being a = uneducated response. I ment to tell you, but forgot. I am also now thinking that the .093 may be too large for the outer - = however it won't see the same heat, nor expand as much as the inner. Their results will be interesting. George ( down under) George, It may be that only you and I are interested in the correct size = of the coolent O-rings and/or the need for a TES outer O-ring........Housing is boxed and ready to ship to "Creavey" Monday ! -- Kelly Troyer=20 Dyke Delta/13B/RD1C/EC2=20 ------=_NextPart_000_0006_01C59042.F7393550 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Kelly,

Maybe at this present point in time, = but who knows=20 down the track.

BTW one size I omitted for the inner = "O" ring was=20 the .093" which was approx 1 : .77 - good for that size recess, I = thought by=20 just looking at it,it would be too small ( thin), which Bill = identified as=20 being a uneducated response.

I ment to tell you, but = forgot.

I am also now thinking that the .093 = may be too=20 large for the outer - however it won't see the same heat, nor expand as = much as=20 the inner.

Their results will be = interesting.

George ( down under)

George,

It may be that only you and I are interested = in the=20 correct size of the

coolent O-rings and/or the need for a TES outer=20 O-ring........Housing

is boxed and ready to ship to "Creavey" Monday !

--
Kelly Troyer
Dyke=20 Delta/13B/RD1C/EC2

------=_NextPart_000_0006_01C59042.F7393550--