X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from [201.225.225.168] (HELO cwpanama.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.5) with ESMTP id 1022641 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 26 Jun 2005 22:38:22 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=201.225.225.168; envelope-from=rijakits@cwpanama.net Received: from [201.224.93.110] (HELO usuarioq3efog0) by frontend2.cwpanama.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with SMTP id 43511108 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 26 Jun 2005 21:44:24 -0500 Message-ID: <004b01c57ac1$088296e0$6e5de0c9@usuarioq3efog0> From: "rijakits" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: amphib thoughts Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 21:36:32 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Here we go: http://www.vansaircraft.com/public/amphib.htm Thomas J. ----- Original Message ----- From: "rijakits" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2005 8:50 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: amphib thoughts > Somewhere on Van's site you see a RV-6 on floats. > Might not be that much work after all! > > Thomas J. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "kevin lane" > To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" > Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2005 7:35 PM > Subject: [FlyRotary] amphib thoughts > > > > I am not flying my -6A as extensively as I used to and have been having > > crazy thoughts, probably from exposure to Rusty, of trading in on an > amphib. > > I was looking at the Sea Ray then remembered that Mr Coot himself lives > > right across the river from me. Ken, give me a call if you would please. > > You can bring me up to par on what to look for and what to avoid. I > checked > > into putting the -6A on floats, but there are too many changes to be worth > > it. I think I want a completed project since I have enough going trying > to > > build the -8. If you guys have comments on this idea I'd would like to > hear > > them. I keep reading about how much fun float planes can be. I guess I > can > > handle the 80 mph until the -8 is completed. > > Kevin Lane Portland, OR (503) 233-1818 > > e-mail-> n3773@comcast.net > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "al p wick" > > To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" > > Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2005 5:02 PM > > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Coolant Leak > > > > > > > Actually, I think the opposite is true. I understand the auto approach > is > > > to NOT have any air in the cooling system. I don't recall the details of > > > their reasoning. In my experience, the safety advantage of cup-o-air is > > > much more significant. > > > BTW, it's probably more like 2 cups. The goal is to have enough air > > > cushion to prevent pressure from reaching cap rating. When you include > > > coolant temp, fluid level, and pressure info, it really improves your > > > understanding of how your system is behaving. > > > > > > If you ever open your car radiator and find air at top, it indicates a > > > problem with your cooling system. > > > > > > > > > > > > -al wick > > > Artificial intelligence in cockpit, Cozy IV powered by stock Subaru 2.5 > > > N9032U 200+ hours on engine/airframe from Portland, Oregon > > > Prop construct, Subaru install, Risk assessment, Glass panel design > info: > > > http://www.maddyhome.com/canardpages/pages/alwick/index.html > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 13:15:14 -0400 "Ian Dewhirst" > > > writes: > > >> Al, your experience with the value of having an air cushion is > > >> supported by > > >> every automotive cooling system that I have ever seen (many). > > >> Typically > > >> autos use either a pressure cap and expansion tank that is not > > >> filled to the > > >> top, or an overflow bottle into which coolant is expelled and > > >> recovered. I > > >> get the impression that some people assume that these overflow style > > >> systems > > >> contain no vapour when cold, I don't think that assumption is > > >> correct. The > > >> overflow systems all have expansion capacity built into the top of > > >> the > > >> radiator, or some other part of the cooling system they are never > > >> completely > > >> filled with coolant. The bigger the cooling system the greater the > > >> volume > > >> of vapour stored cold. > > >> > > >> -- Ian > > >> > > >> (GM, Chrysler, and Ford are not trying to piss you off with those > > >> side > > >> mounted radiator caps.. ;-) > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> -----Original Message----- > > >> From: Rotary motors in aircraft > > >> [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net]On > > >> Behalf Of al p wick > > >> Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2005 11:58 AM > > >> To: Rotary motors in aircraft > > >> Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Coolant Leak > > >> > > >> > > >> My focus is on flight safety. I found great value to having appx. 1 > > >> cup > > >> of air at the top of my cooling system.... > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > > >> >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html > > >> > > >> > > > > > >>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > > >>> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html > > > > > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html > > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html