X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from [201.225.225.167] (HELO cwpanama.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.5) with ESMTP id 1022603 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 26 Jun 2005 21:52:35 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=201.225.225.167; envelope-from=rijakits@cwpanama.net Received: from [201.224.93.110] (HELO usuarioq3efog0) by frontend1.cwpanama.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with SMTP id 44510136 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 26 Jun 2005 20:55:21 -0500 Message-ID: <002c01c57aba$a44777a0$6e5de0c9@usuarioq3efog0> From: "rijakits" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] amphib thoughts Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 20:50:47 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Somewhere on Van's site you see a RV-6 on floats. Might not be that much work after all! Thomas J. ----- Original Message ----- From: "kevin lane" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2005 7:35 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] amphib thoughts > I am not flying my -6A as extensively as I used to and have been having > crazy thoughts, probably from exposure to Rusty, of trading in on an amphib. > I was looking at the Sea Ray then remembered that Mr Coot himself lives > right across the river from me. Ken, give me a call if you would please. > You can bring me up to par on what to look for and what to avoid. I checked > into putting the -6A on floats, but there are too many changes to be worth > it. I think I want a completed project since I have enough going trying to > build the -8. If you guys have comments on this idea I'd would like to hear > them. I keep reading about how much fun float planes can be. I guess I can > handle the 80 mph until the -8 is completed. > Kevin Lane Portland, OR (503) 233-1818 > e-mail-> n3773@comcast.net > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "al p wick" > To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" > Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2005 5:02 PM > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Coolant Leak > > > > Actually, I think the opposite is true. I understand the auto approach is > > to NOT have any air in the cooling system. I don't recall the details of > > their reasoning. In my experience, the safety advantage of cup-o-air is > > much more significant. > > BTW, it's probably more like 2 cups. The goal is to have enough air > > cushion to prevent pressure from reaching cap rating. When you include > > coolant temp, fluid level, and pressure info, it really improves your > > understanding of how your system is behaving. > > > > If you ever open your car radiator and find air at top, it indicates a > > problem with your cooling system. > > > > > > > > -al wick > > Artificial intelligence in cockpit, Cozy IV powered by stock Subaru 2.5 > > N9032U 200+ hours on engine/airframe from Portland, Oregon > > Prop construct, Subaru install, Risk assessment, Glass panel design info: > > http://www.maddyhome.com/canardpages/pages/alwick/index.html > > > > > > > > On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 13:15:14 -0400 "Ian Dewhirst" > > writes: > >> Al, your experience with the value of having an air cushion is > >> supported by > >> every automotive cooling system that I have ever seen (many). > >> Typically > >> autos use either a pressure cap and expansion tank that is not > >> filled to the > >> top, or an overflow bottle into which coolant is expelled and > >> recovered. I > >> get the impression that some people assume that these overflow style > >> systems > >> contain no vapour when cold, I don't think that assumption is > >> correct. The > >> overflow systems all have expansion capacity built into the top of > >> the > >> radiator, or some other part of the cooling system they are never > >> completely > >> filled with coolant. The bigger the cooling system the greater the > >> volume > >> of vapour stored cold. > >> > >> -- Ian > >> > >> (GM, Chrysler, and Ford are not trying to piss you off with those > >> side > >> mounted radiator caps.. ;-) > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Rotary motors in aircraft > >> [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net]On > >> Behalf Of al p wick > >> Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2005 11:58 AM > >> To: Rotary motors in aircraft > >> Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Coolant Leak > >> > >> > >> My focus is on flight safety. I found great value to having appx. 1 > >> cup > >> of air at the top of my cooling system.... > >> > >> > >> > >> >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >> >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html > >> > >> > > > >>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >>> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html > > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html