X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from m12.lax.untd.com ([64.136.30.75] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.5) with SMTP id 1022113 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 26 Jun 2005 12:24:56 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.136.30.75; envelope-from=alwick@juno.com Received: from m12.lax.untd.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by m12.lax.untd.com with SMTP id AABBM7XWUA5BM7VJ for (sender ); Sun, 26 Jun 2005 09:23:46 -0700 (PDT) X-UNTD-OriginStamp: L941HVjjYzDhN3itp//mkNtLqOmVcjQ/mFjES+KZBdbcsV0G9ndOUw== Received: (from alwick@juno.com) by m12.lax.untd.com (jqueuemail) id KWFEE4LP; Sun, 26 Jun 2005 09:23:26 PDT To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 08:58:28 -0700 Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Coolant Leak Message-ID: <20050626.092313.3024.1.alwick@juno.com> X-Mailer: Juno 5.0.33 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Juno-Line-Breaks: 5,8,11-12,15-16,18-28,30-42 From: al p wick X-ContentStamp: 14:7:852386750 X-MAIL-INFO:3ae0e0e96074bdd9e57169e975694999c9105169fd6dc5b960fd5110fd40fda080a9e485e019e990e905602949390429d9740d X-UNTD-Peer-Info: 127.0.0.1|localhost|m12.lax.untd.com|alwick@juno.com My focus is on flight safety. I found great value to having appx. 1 cup of air at the top of my cooling system. With the cup of air, my system never exceeds 8 psi. So this allows me to measure cooling system integrity (using psi). Without the cup of air, the pressure reading always rises to 24 psi, then fluctuates. This prevents me from using pressure info in meaningful way. With cup of air, if I apply full throttle and have compression leak into cooling system, I would see spike to 24 psi. Without cup of air, I would not notice that spike. With cup of air, the closer I get to 24 psi, the closer I am to serious condition. Pressure is an excellent predictor, fast responding and measuring more than one characteristic. On startup, my cooling sys is always 0 psi. 5 min later, before takeoff, it rises to 1 psi. On takeoff, it gradually rises to 7 psi. All pressure changes very gradual. So from a safety point of view, I would never consider going back to the full coolant system. -al wick Artificial intelligence in cockpit, Cozy IV powered by stock Subaru 2.5 N9032U 200+ hours on engine/airframe from Portland, Oregon Prop construct, Subaru install, Risk assessment, Glass panel design info: http://www.maddyhome.com/canardpages/pages/alwick/index.html On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 10:05:16 -0400 "Ed Anderson" writes: > Good question, John > > If the analysis is correct, it may indeed be better to have a small > cushion > of air at as an absorber. All of my coolant components take at > least 250 > psi (radiator cap and water pump seals excepted). The only concern > I have > with higher pressure is blowing out the seal around the water pump > shaft - > don't have any idea how much pressure that might take. > > Ed