Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #2446
From: Tracy Crook <lors01@msn.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Cooling / Pressure recovery
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 16:54:03 -0400
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
 
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Cooling / Pressure recovery

ps.  Would someone precisely define "pressure recovery" for me?   
Regards,
Tommy James<><
Cool in NC, Hot in FL 
 
By pressure recovery I mean the 'recovery of the dynamic pressure due to the forward velocity of the airplane, this is what is measured by the airspeed indicator.  There is a formula to calculate dynamic pressure at any given airspeed.  Don't remember it off the top of my head but a web search on "Dynamic air pressure" will no doubt turn it up.  I recommended the ASI instrument because it takes all the formulas & math out of the measurement.  The pressure goes up as the square of speed (really  fast). 
 
Example:  The dynamic pressure at 120 mph is 7.6" H2O.  Before doing a bit of inlet work, my right side rad only had around 3.5" pressure at this speed.  The left rad had 8.1"  (Super good, got a .5" boost from prop blast). A slight reshaping the right side inlet boosted it from 3.5 to around 5.5 .    Doesn't sound like much but remember that the back side pressure was around 2" which meant that the differential pressure across the rad (front to back) was only 1.5"  By raising the front side to 5.5 the differential pressure is now 3.5"  (more than doubled!).  5.5 is still not great so I'll be doing more work on the inlet to get it closer to what the left side is getting.   I'm explaining all this in inches of pressure because Paul insisted on using all those water manometers when we did the test.  Couldn't fly faster than 120 for the test because it would blow the water out of the manometers if I did.  Gets much simpler with the ASI instrument.
 
Keep in mind that the test only gives you the raw data.  Interpretation is still up to you.  For example, Paul Lamar concluded that the right thing to do was to reduce the back side pressure on the rads (using a cowl flap, louvers in cowl, etc) since he considers the 'right' value there to be zero.  I had the opposite conclusion. 
 
Here's the thing that makes it confusing.  If you look only at cooling results,  Paul was right.  I could have gotten equal or better cooling improvement by using a cowl flap.  BUT,  this improvement comes at the expense of added drag, especially at cruise & top speed (racing).  By improving the pressure recovery instead, I got the improved cooling with almost no increase in cooling drag.  This is the ultimate goal in aircraft cooling design.
 
Tracy Crook
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster