X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from mail26.syd.optusnet.com.au ([211.29.133.167] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.4) with ESMTPS id 1010967 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 02:01:50 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=211.29.133.167; envelope-from=lendich@optusnet.com.au Received: from george (d220-236-0-190.dsl.nsw.optusnet.com.au [220.236.0.190]) by mail26.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id j5N61171019170 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 16:01:02 +1000 Message-ID: <001d01c577b8$f59026c0$be00ecdc@george> From: "George Lendich" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: PP debate was Re: Single PP HP? Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 16:01:11 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 . My needs in an RV-7 would be in the 160-180hp (actual cruise > power setting) & someone in an RV-10 would need 190-210 actual cruise hp. > > Charlie Charlie, 160 to 180 hp I would use a side port 13B with Mistral's manifold. For 200 + I would be looking at the PP. The Jury is out on the RX8 until there's a replacement manifold, as I believe the additional HP is in the complex manifold design. George ( down under)