X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from fed1rmmtao06.cox.net ([68.230.241.33] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.4) with ESMTP id 1010775 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 21:14:19 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.241.33; envelope-from=ALVentures@cox.net Received: from BigAl ([68.7.14.39]) by fed1rmmtao06.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with ESMTP id <20050623011327.CBCD19494.fed1rmmtao06.cox.net@BigAl> for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 21:13:27 -0400 From: "Al Gietzen" To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: PSRU adapter plate Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 18:13:28 -0700 Message-ID: <000001c57790$c38fe2f0$6400a8c0@BigAl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0001_01C57756.17310AF0" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C57756.17310AF0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ernest; =20 I=92d basically agree with Kelly also; because with the complex stress patterns in that plate it is very unlikely that that =BD the thickness = would only double the stress; and the deformations would be larger making = fatigue failure in areas of the plate a serious concern. Can=92t be worth the = risk for 3-4 lbs. =20 Al =20 -----Original Message----- From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Ernest Christley Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 12:30 PM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: PSRU adapter plate =20 Dean wrote: =20 > Ernest > =20 > I agree with Kelly on this. Quite aside from any structural=20 > considerations, in looking at Tracy's exploded view of the RD=20 > assembly, it appears that you would be moving the whole main gear=20 > housing assembly 1/4 inch closer to the eccentric shaft and trying to=20 > force the input shaft/sun gear 1/4 inch deeper into the planetary=20 > gears. From examination of my uninstalled RD-1B, I believe that all=20 > shaft lengths, bearings, thrust bearings, clearances,etc, are=20 > carefully based on use of the 1/2 inch plate, and it would be=20 > impossible to use anything thinner.=20 > =20 > Dean Van Winkle > RV-9A Fuselage/Finish '89 13B NA, RD-1B, EC2, EM2 =20 =20 Thanks, Dean, but the RD-1 measurements won't be a consideration. I=20 have a different PSRU. =20 --=20 ,|"|"|, | ----=3D=3D=3D<{{(oQo)}}>=3D=3D=3D---- Dyke Delta | o| d |o www.ernest.isa-geek.org | =20 >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C57756.17310AF0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Ernest;

 

I’d basically agree with Kelly also; because = with the complex stress patterns in that plate it is very unlikely that that = =BD the thickness would only double the stress; and the deformations would be = larger making fatigue failure in areas of the plate a serious concern.=A0 = Can’t be worth the risk for 3-4 lbs.

 

Al

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On = Behalf Of Ernest Christley
Sent:
Wednesday, June 22, 2005 12:30 PM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: PSRU adapter plate

 

Dean wrote:

 

> Ernest

>=A0

> I agree with Kelly on this.=A0 Quite aside from any structural =

> considerations,=A0 in looking at Tracy's exploded view of = the RD

> assembly, it appears that you would be moving the whole main gear =

> housing assembly 1/4 inch closer to the eccentric shaft and trying to =

> force the input shaft/sun gear 1/4 inch deeper into the planetary =

> gears.=A0 From examination of my uninstalled RD-1B, I believe that all =

> shaft lengths, bearings, thrust bearings, clearances,etc, are =

> carefully based on use of the 1/2 inch plate, and it would be =

> impossible to use anything thinner.

>=A0

> Dean Van Winkle

> RV-9A=A0 Fuselage/Finish=A0=A0 '89 13B NA, RD-1B, EC2, = EM2

 

 

Thanks, Dean, but the RD-1 measurements won't be a consideration.=A0 I =

have a different PSRU.

 

--

=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 ,|"|"|,=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0= =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 |

----=3D=3D=3D<{{(oQo)}}>=3D=3D=3D----=A0= =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 Dyke Delta=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 |

=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 o|=A0 d=A0 |o=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 www.ernest.isa-geek.org=A0 = |

 

>>=A0 Homepage:=A0 http://www.flyrotary.com/

>>=A0 Archive:=A0=A0 = http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html

------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C57756.17310AF0--