Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #24315
From: George Lendich <lendich@optusnet.com.au>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: PSRU adapter plate
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 09:22:26 +1000
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
I agree Tracy the flexing would be my concern - this alone could lead to failure of the plate. One would need significant development and costly testing to identify the lightest possible stiffening required. This could bring it up to the weight of the 1/2" plate with recesses.
George ( down under)
The error in reasoning here (7075 is twice as strong as 6061 so it can be half as thick) is that the bending strength of a plate is far more influenced by its thickness than by material strength.   This is in addition to the fit problems pointed out by Dean.
 
Just not a good idea.
 
Tracy



> My bellhousing is to heavy. Dave McC is considering buying it for his
> Europa, so I've been researching what it would take to replace it. I
> think Tracy' s adapter plate is a very elegant solution for the
> homebuilder (ie, those of use without a foundry).
>
> His adapter plate uses 1/2" 6061. I've been considering at 7075
> aluminum. It has about twice the cost but also twice the yield
> strength. If I could use 1/4" plate instead of the 1/2", the cost would
> be comparable, but I would have the very large benefit of saving
> something on the order of 4lbs in a very weight sensitive area. I don't
> have the expertise to run the numbers with confidence. All I can do is
> a static analysis following the directions outlined on PL's website,
> just like I did for the engine mount.
>
> Any advise of stuff to look for that might no be so obvious and not show
> up in a static analysis? (the three axis and torsional forces are obvious)
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster