Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #24302
From: Dean <dvanwinkle@royell.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: PSRU adapter plate
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 15:07:25 -0500
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Ernest
 
I agree with Kelly on this.  Quite aside from any structural considerations,  in looking at Tracy's exploded view of the RD assembly, it appears that you would be moving the whole main gear housing assembly 1/4 inch closer to the eccentric shaft and trying to force the input shaft/sun gear 1/4 inch deeper into the planetary gears.  From examination of my uninstalled RD-1B, I believe that all shaft lengths, bearings, thrust bearings, clearances,etc, are carefully based on use of the 1/2 inch plate, and it would be impossible to use anything thinner. 
 
Dean Van Winkle
RV-9A  Fuselage/Finish   '89 13B NA, RD-1B, EC2, EM2
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 1:08 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: PSRU adapter plate

Ernest,
    Without any engineering expertise I would not even consider using
1/4" aluminum plate no matter what alloy !!FWIW
--
Kelly Troyer
Dyke Delta/13B/RD1C/EC2
-------------- Original message from Ernest Christley <echristley@nc.rr.com>: --------------


> My bellhousing is to heavy. Dave McC is considering buying it for his
> Europa, so I've been researching what it would take to replace it. I
> think Tracy' s adapter plate is a very elegant solution for the
> homebuilder (ie, those of use without a foundry).
>
> His adapter plate uses 1/2" 6061. I've been considering at 7075
> aluminum. It has about twice the cost but also twice the yield
> strength. If I could use 1/4" plate instead of the 1/2", the cost would
> be comparable, but I would have the very large benefit of saving
> something on the order of 4lbs in a very weight sensitive area. I don't
> have the expertise to run the numbers with confidence. All I can do is
> a static analysis following the directions outlined on PL's website,
> just like I did for the engine mount.
>
> Any advise of stuff to look for that might no be so obvious and not show
> up in a static analysis? (the three axis and torsional forces are obvious)
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster