X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from sj-iport-2.cisco.com ([171.71.176.71] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.4) with ESMTP id 1005306 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 13:47:12 -0400 Received-SPF: softfail receiver=logan.com; client-ip=171.71.176.71; envelope-from=echristley@nc.rr.com Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com (171.71.177.254) by sj-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 17 Jun 2005 10:46:27 -0700 Received: from xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-211.cisco.com [64.102.31.102]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id j5HHkC7t003265 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 10:46:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.21]) by xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Fri, 17 Jun 2005 13:46:16 -0400 Received: from [64.102.45.251] ([64.102.45.251]) by xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Fri, 17 Jun 2005 13:46:16 -0400 Message-ID: <42B30C67.1090609@nc.rr.com> Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 13:46:15 -0400 From: Ernest Christley User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Brake Fluid References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Jun 2005 17:46:16.0221 (UTC) FILETIME=[75EB5CD0:01C57364] jesse farr wrote: > It is supposed to not corrode aluminum wheel and master cylinders; so > I have been told. DOT5 will probably do anything it will do, better. > The only reason to run aviation anything in a non certificated > aircraft is just to be cool, I guess. > jofarr, soddy tn > > ----- Original Message ----- *From:* WRJJRS@aol.com > > > Brake fluid that's flammable! > I knew there was a so called aviation brake fluid, but couldn't > figure why anyone would use it though. Is there anyone on list > that has an idea of what the aircraft fluid is supposed to do better? > First let me say that there are modern fluids for racing that are > good to incredible temps and are non-corrosive to aluminum. Hell > most of the calipers used on race cars have been aluminum for > years. Water accumulation is the only possible question that I > could see and modern fluids have no problem there. Silicone based > fluids have the advantage of not harming paint, but have > compressibility issues at high temperatures. I am planning to run > a high temp racing fluid unless somebody can tell me why I "must" > run aviation fluid. > Whatever you use, verify that it is compatible with the brake seals. For instance the "General Wheel & Brake Information" document at: http://matco.elixirlabs.com/catalog/index.php?file=catalog&uid=2192&prod_pcategory=77774&clist=0,77774&uid=2192 says: "All o-rings in the brake and master cylinder assembly are buna nitrile and are not compatible with automotive glycol based brake fluid. ONLY red aircraft fluid (Mil-H-5606) or other suitable petroleum-based or silicon-based fluid should be used." -- ,|"|"|, | ----===<{{(oQo)}}>===---- Dyke Delta | o| d |o www.ernest.isa-geek.org |