X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from mxsf23.cluster1.charter.net ([209.225.28.223] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.4) with ESMTP id 1005180 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 11:49:42 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.225.28.223; envelope-from=cardmarc@charter.net Received: from mxip08a.cluster1.charter.net (mxip08a.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.138]) by mxsf23.cluster1.charter.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j5HFmu2Q017745 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 11:48:56 -0400 Received: from fep04.charter.net (HELO 209.225.8.224) (209.225.8.84) by mxip08a.cluster1.charter.net with SMTP; 17 Jun 2005 11:48:57 -0400 Message-Id: <43vtj8$ub93kq@mxip08a.cluster1.charter.net> X-IronPort-AV: i="3.93,208,1115006400"; d="scan'208"; a="1018465946:sNHT14141362" X-Mailer: Openwave WebEngine, version 2.8.18 (webedge20-101-1108-20050216) From: To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] PSRU adapter plate Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 11:48:56 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit What kind of bellhousing did you plan on using? The stock one? Marc > From: Ernest Christley > Date: 2005/06/17 Fri AM 11:26:43 EDT > To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" > Subject: [FlyRotary] PSRU adapter plate > > My bellhousing is to heavy. Dave McC is considering buying it for his > Europa, so I've been researching what it would take to replace it. I > think Tracy' s adapter plate is a very elegant solution for the > homebuilder (ie, those of use without a foundry). > > His adapter plate uses 1/2" 6061. I've been considering at 7075 > aluminum. It has about twice the cost but also twice the yield > strength. If I could use 1/4" plate instead of the 1/2", the cost would > be comparable, but I would have the very large benefit of saving > something on the order of 4lbs in a very weight sensitive area. I don't > have the expertise to run the numbers with confidence. All I can do is > a static analysis following the directions outlined on PL's website, > just like I did for the engine mount. > > Any advise of stuff to look for that might no be so obvious and not show > up in a static analysis? (the three axis and torsional forces are obvious) > > Ernest (hoping I didn't coin any more new words) > > -- > ,|"|"|, | > ----===<{{(oQo)}}>===---- Dyke Delta | > o| d |o www.ernest.isa-geek.org | > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html >