X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from rtp-iport-2.cisco.com ([64.102.122.149] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.4) with ESMTP id 1005162 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 11:28:26 -0400 Received-SPF: softfail receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.102.122.149; envelope-from=echristley@nc.rr.com Received: from rtp-core-2.cisco.com (64.102.124.13) by rtp-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 17 Jun 2005 11:27:36 -0400 Received: from xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-201.cisco.com [64.102.31.12]) by rtp-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id j5HFQAiP015354 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 11:26:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.21]) by xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Fri, 17 Jun 2005 11:26:43 -0400 Received: from [64.102.45.251] ([64.102.45.251]) by xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Fri, 17 Jun 2005 11:26:43 -0400 Message-ID: <42B2EBB3.3050405@nc.rr.com> Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 11:26:43 -0400 From: Ernest Christley User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: PSRU adapter plate Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Jun 2005 15:26:43.0408 (UTC) FILETIME=[F7557D00:01C57350] My bellhousing is to heavy. Dave McC is considering buying it for his Europa, so I've been researching what it would take to replace it. I think Tracy' s adapter plate is a very elegant solution for the homebuilder (ie, those of use without a foundry). His adapter plate uses 1/2" 6061. I've been considering at 7075 aluminum. It has about twice the cost but also twice the yield strength. If I could use 1/4" plate instead of the 1/2", the cost would be comparable, but I would have the very large benefit of saving something on the order of 4lbs in a very weight sensitive area. I don't have the expertise to run the numbers with confidence. All I can do is a static analysis following the directions outlined on PL's website, just like I did for the engine mount. Any advise of stuff to look for that might no be so obvious and not show up in a static analysis? (the three axis and torsional forces are obvious) Ernest (hoping I didn't coin any more new words) -- ,|"|"|, | ----===<{{(oQo)}}>===---- Dyke Delta | o| d |o www.ernest.isa-geek.org |