X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from fed1rmmtao01.cox.net ([68.230.241.38] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.4) with ESMTP id 1004240 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 14:00:28 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.241.38; envelope-from=dale.r@cox.net Received: from smtp.west.cox.net ([172.18.180.52]) by fed1rmmtao01.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with SMTP id <20050616175936.EAKI7629.fed1rmmtao01.cox.net@smtp.west.cox.net> for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 13:59:36 -0400 X-Mailer: Openwave WebEngine, version 2.8.15 (webedge20-101-1103-20040528) From: Dale Rogers To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: [FlyRotary] re-drive question for Tracy Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 13:59:37 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20050616175936.EAKI7629.fed1rmmtao01.cox.net@smtp.west.cox.net> Tracy, Ian brough up a point that could also apply to the re-drive. Since the planet ass'y was originally designed for lubrication with ATF, is there any particular reason why it couldn't be run as a closed system with a "scavage" pump circulating ATF, instead of using engine oil? Dunno if there's any advantage to the ATF, for that matter, but I thought I'd ask. Dale (to whom the thought just occurred that this may have already been discussed - some years ago - and could be in the archives.) > From: "Ian Dewhirst" > Date: 2005/06/16 Thu AM 10:52:04 EDT > To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: turbo oil drain > > Hi Rusty, there is no rule that states that you have to use engine > oil, since you already have a pump to scavenge and you really don't need > much oil pressure for a turbo, add a small sump and a little cooler perhaps, > and your worries of an engine oil leak are over. The added advantage is > that you can lubricate before start and cool after shutdown.