Great idea to maybe get the EAA involved, i.e. make us tech counelors
with a rotary engine label.  However that would likely exclude most
who have not completed and flown an installation.  Also, bad idea to
try to get anythng done at OSH, that place is a zoo.  :-)

Dave Leonard

On 5/22/05, Giffen A Marr <gamarr@charter.net> wrote:
> The idea of TA's and Investigators is a good idea. We would need to
> establish a level of credibility for the group. I would propose the same
> solution as Ehkerr. The EAA has the established credibility with the FAA and
> NTSB, so as previously suggested, we should do it under the auspices of the
> EAA Technical Advisor program. If we put together a group of qualified
> people and were sanctioned under the EAA TA program, we could then assist
> the FAA/NTSB in their investigations. There are no other "interested
> parties" in the experimental world as there are in the certificated world,
> such as the engine manufacture, pilots union, airframe manufacturer or
> operating company. We could fill that void.
>
> Anyone interesting in pursuing this at Oshkosh this year?
>
> Giff Marr
> LIVP/20B 35%
>
>
> >>  Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
> >>  Archive:   http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html
>


--
Wm. David Leonard