Return-Path: Received: from imo-r08.mx.aol.com ([152.163.225.104] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1b8) with ESMTP id 2433292 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 19:06:41 -0400 Received: from Lehanover@aol.com by imo-r08.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v36.3.) id q.11a.2480c883 (4320) for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 19:06:27 -0400 (EDT) From: Lehanover@aol.com Message-ID: <11a.2480c883.2c20f8f3@aol.com> Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 19:06:27 EDT Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Starter Problem To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 138 In a message dated 6/17/2003 2:06:14 PM Eastern Daylight Time, lors01@msn.com writes: > The term "contactor" usually refers to the relay that carries the main > current supply to the starter. This is already built in to the starter > (solenoid). True, the contactor or solenoid takes a good bit of current to > actuate but a separate relay to handle this seems like unnecessary > complication when a *PROPER* switch will do the job. Just haven't heard a > compelling reason why this relay is necessary. > > Tracy > Right, if the starter has a solenoid. If not, then a solenoid should be used to power up the starter. Lynn E. Hanover