Message

Return-Path: <13brv3@bellsouth.net> Received: from imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.70] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c3) with ESMTP id 820848 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 22:11:51 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.70; envelope-from=13brv3@bellsouth.net Received: from rd ([65.6.194.9]) by imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.11 201-253-122-130-111-20040605) with ESMTP id <20050326031107.FMZQ2068.imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net@rd> for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 22:11:07 -0500 From: "Russell Duffy" <13brv3@bellsouth.net> To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: RX8 P-Port Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 21:11:27 -0600 Message-ID: <008f01c531b1$8009de70$6101a8c0@rd> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0090_01C5317F.356F6E70" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0090_01C5317F.356F6E70 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I claim rights to the first RX8 PP design, but of course everyone can = use it. I'm betting that if it's a good idea, Mazda already thought of it for = their racing engine. If it's a bad idea, I don't think they'll mind if you = claim it :-) =20 I hate to always be the skeptic, but I don't quite understand wanting to = PP a Renesis. The engine is already capable of peak power at higher RPM's = than any of us want to run. To me, that means it already has good intake = timing, and plenty of intake port flow. What's to be gained with this PP = exercise? Are you trying to boost HP at lower rpms that we would run at? That = sure doesn't sound like a typical PP justification. =20 Cheers, Rusty (becoming immune to fiberglass dust, or loosing all feeling, hard = to tell) ------=_NextPart_000_0090_01C5317F.356F6E70 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message

I claim rights to the first RX8 PP design, but of = course=20 everyone can use it.

I'm betting that if it's a good = idea, Mazda=20 already thought of it for their racing engine. If it's a bad = idea, I=20 don't think they'll mind if you claim it :-)

I hate to always be the skeptic, = but I don't=20 quite understand wanting to PP a Renesis. The engine is already = capable of=20 peak power at higher RPM's than any of us want to run. To me, that = means=20 it already has good intake timing, and plenty of intake port flow. = What's=20 to be gained with this PP exercise? Are you trying to boost HP at = lower=20 rpms that we would run at? That sure doesn't sound like a typical = PP=20 justification.

Cheers,

Rusty (becoming immune to = fiberglass dust, or=20 loosing all feeling, hard to tell)

------=_NextPart_000_0090_01C5317F.356F6E70--