Return-Path: Received: from imo-m27.mx.aol.com ([64.12.137.8] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c3) with ESMTP id 801722 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 01:59:36 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.137.8; envelope-from=WRJJRS@aol.com Received: from WRJJRS@aol.com by imo-m27.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v37_r3.8.) id q.c4.2375d6fa (25711) for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 01:58:46 -0500 (EST) From: WRJJRS@aol.com Message-ID: Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 01:58:46 EST Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Returnless fuel systems To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1111129126" X-Mailer: 9.0 SE for Windows sub 5005 -------------------------------1111129126 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 3/17/2005 7:37:12 PM Pacific Standard Time, echristley@nc.rr.com writes: Alcohol in the gas is not a technical solution; it is a political solution. Several local news stations have tested the effectiveness of the alcohol gas by filling up average cars and taking them to an inspection station. The 'oxygenated' gas always performs worse. Which makes complete sense. If you carefully tune an engine to burn a specific type of gas, it will be slightly out of tune for any other. Ernest this is EXACTLY what I would believe about the process. My car, EFI and O2 sensor type ALWAYS gets better mileage on non-california fuels. This is not a conjecture but rather carefully tested results on 3 different trips. Bill Jepson -------------------------------1111129126 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In a message dated 3/17/2005 7:37:12 PM Pacific Standard Time,=20 echristley@nc.rr.com writes:
<= FONT=20 style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=3DArial color=3D#000000 size= =3D2>Alcohol=20 in the gas is not a technical solution; it is a political
solution.&nb= sp;=20 Several local news stations have tested the effectiveness of
the alcoh= ol=20 gas by filling up average cars and taking them to an
inspection=20 station.  The 'oxygenated' gas always performs worse.  Which&nbs= p;=20
makes complete sense.  If you carefully tune an engine to burn a=20
specific type of gas, it will be slightly out of tune for any=20 other.
Ernest this is EXACTLY what I would believe about the process. My car,=20= EFI=20 and O2 sensor type ALWAYS gets better mileage on non-california fuels. This=20= is=20 not a conjecture but rather carefully tested results on 3 different trips.
Bill Jepson
-------------------------------1111129126--