|
|
As someone who has only recently discovered the EWP, I occasionally do a fresh internet search to learn more. Tonight a new article popped up which is really quite good on the installation and performance of the Craig Davies EWP. It can be viewed at:
http://www.fordmuscle.com/archives/2000/08/electricwaterpump Jerry
On Monday, March 14, 2005, at 06:46 PM, Bob White wrote:
Good point Jesse. If I guess at 80% effeciency for the conversion
(WAG), it would only be 13.6 A. I think it's just the alternator
efficiency though since I'm comparing to another EWP.
Bob W.
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 18:32:27 -0500
"jesse farr" <jesse@jessfarr.com> wrote:
Bob: If only taking 200 W engine output, with alternator inefficiency and
ewp inefficiency, wonder what wattage would it be really using ?
jofarr, soddy tn
----- Original Message ----- From: "Bob White" <bob@bob-white.com>
BMW___s system taking up a maximum of 200 W engine output as
opposed to the power uptake of a conventional water pump of up to 2 kW."
OK, so 200 W is about 17 amps.
Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/
Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html
-- http://www.bob-white.com
N93BD - Rotary Powered BD-4 (real soon)
Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/
Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html
|
|