Return-Path: <bdube@al.noaa.gov>
Received: from tomcat.al.noaa.gov ([140.172.240.2] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c2)
  with ESMTP id 793569 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 19:48:36 -0500
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=140.172.240.2; envelope-from=bdube@al.noaa.gov
Received: from PILEUS.al.noaa.gov (pileus.al.noaa.gov [140.172.241.195])
	by tomcat.al.noaa.gov (8.12.11/8.12.0) with ESMTP id j2F0lpsL023972
	for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 17:47:51 -0700 (MST)
Message-Id: <5.2.1.1.0.20050314173759.0566e1a8@mailsrvr.al.noaa.gov>
X-Sender: bdube@mailsrvr.al.noaa.gov
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.1
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 17:47:31 -0700
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
From: Bill Dube <bdube@al.noaa.gov>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Electric water pump
In-Reply-To: <list-793525@logan.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

At 04:46 PM 3/14/2005 -0700, you wrote:

>Good point Jesse.  If I guess at 80% effeciency for the conversion
>(WAG), it would only be 13.6 A.  I think it's just the alternator
>efficiency though since I'm comparing to another EWP.

         We all are assuming a 12 volt system. They have been talking about 
42 volt (36 volt nominal) automobile electrical systems for awhile. Is this 
car indeed 12 volts?