Return-Path: <jesse@jessfarr.com>
Received: from [216.148.227.89] (HELO rwcrmhc11.comcast.net)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c2)
  with ESMTP id 771752 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 05 Mar 2005 14:17:53 -0500
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.148.227.89; envelope-from=jesse@jessfarr.com
Received: from office5 (pcp04959909pcs.midval01.tn.comcast.net[68.59.199.44])
          by comcast.net (rwcrmhc14) with SMTP
          id <20050305191707014001nspoe>; Sat, 5 Mar 2005 19:17:07 +0000
Message-ID: <00ed01c521b7$e641f060$057ba8c0@farr.com>
From: "jesse farr" <jesse@jessfarr.com>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
References: <list-771560@logan.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: fuel cutoff valve necessary?
Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 14:16:57 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180

Tucker tried to offer the seat belt and safety ideas in the mid forties; 
but, quality and safety so stimulated the big three auto makers, they used 
our government to harass him into bankruptcy, to avoid competing with such 
outlandish ideas. So, half truths and years delay, even from an enlightened 
government such as we still are being blessed by/with, shouldn't surprise 
any of us; but, like I say, we can chatter all we want but the likliehood of 
our actually e/affecting anything is nil.  Tell me more about EWP versus 
EDWP and airplanes and rotary engines. <g>
jofarr, soddy tn

----- Original Message ----- From: "Dale Rogers" <dale.r@cox.net>

>   I suppose it's a minor nit