Return-Path: <sqpilot@bellsouth.net>
Received: from imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.70] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c2)
  with ESMTP id 770586 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 04 Mar 2005 15:25:24 -0500
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.70; envelope-from=sqpilot@bellsouth.net
Received: from paul52u7f5qyav ([216.78.114.8])
          by imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net
          (InterMail vM.5.01.06.11 201-253-122-130-111-20040605) with SMTP
          id <20050304202438.SHXO2068.imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net@paul52u7f5qyav>
          for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 15:24:38 -0500
Message-ID: <006001c520f8$2ac68a40$df2cd6d1@paul52u7f5qyav>
From: "Paul" <sqpilot@bellsouth.net>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
References: <list-770555@logan.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Do Not Archive
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 14:24:28 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=response
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 2:10 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Do Not Archive

OK, Marv....it is starting to sink in now.  I am guilty of adding the "Do 
not Archive" statement, as I saw others do it.  Won't happen again.  sorry 
about that.  Paul Conner



> I'm sorry, Paul... it looked clear to me, but then again, I wrote it so I 
> already knew what I wanted to say <G>.  What I meant was that there are a 
> number of people who add the text "Do Not Archive" to their posts 
> somewhere. My suggestion was that they never even bother keying in the 
> statement because 1)I don't have the time to follow those posts into the 
> archives and remove them and 2) it's not like an automatic function that I 
> can program into the listserver software, so see #1.  Sorry if my first 
> post was a little obtuse.
>
>  <marv>
>
>
>
> "Paul" <sqpilot@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
>  Hi, Marv....I hate to admit it, but I don't understand what you are 
> saying.
> Do you mean we should not change the subject line in the top blocks where 
> it
> reads Subject: , or do you mean we should not re-type previous statements 
> made
> in the post we are replying to?  Sorry I don't understand.  Paul Conner
>  ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
>  To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
>  Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 10:20 AM
>  Subject: [FlyRotary] Do Not Archive
>
>> For those of you who like to add the Subject content to your post, save 
>> yourself the typing time.  It ain't gonna happen.  There is no need for 
>> discussion, BTW.
>>
>>    <marv>
>>
>>>>  Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
>>>>  Archive:   http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
>> Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.6.1 - Release Date: 3/4/2005
>>
>>
>
>>>  Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
>>>  Archive:   http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html
>
>>>  Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
>>>  Archive:   http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.6.1 - Release Date: 3/4/2005
>
>