Return-Path: Received: from imf17aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.65] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c2) with ESMTP id 770567 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 04 Mar 2005 15:18:29 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.65; envelope-from=sladerj@bellsouth.net Received: from JSLADE ([65.8.33.141]) by imf17aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.11 201-253-122-130-111-20040605) with ESMTP id <20050304201743.RPVU2031.imf17aec.mail.bellsouth.net@JSLADE> for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 15:17:43 -0500 From: "John Slade" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: Fuel Filters Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 15:17:42 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: > I picked up a couple of Earl's filters a local speed shop. They come > with AN-6 fittings on each end, Summit p/n EAR-230106ERL. They have > replacable elements, and they cost about $30 each. Unfortunately, I > now find that they are only rated at 75 psi, and the pump will put out > 95 psi. Looks like I need to look at the GM filters also. I think those are the ones I'm using Bob. The pump may be rated at 95 PSI, but you'll be using it at 40, the the Earls filters are fine. At least that's my logic. John (total compression = 600 PSI :)