Return-Path: Received: from [65.33.84.131] (account ) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.1b7) with HTTP id 2400317 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 03 Jun 2003 08:55:30 -0400 From: "Marvin Kaye" Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: electric vacuum pump - a way unscientific science experiment To: flyrotary X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.1b7 Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2003 08:55:30 -0400 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <5.1.1.5.2.20030603072604.012eceb0@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Posted for Mark Steitle : Matt/John, Here's my 2 cents worth on the subject. Take it for what its worth. I had considered going this route, but there seems to be an inherit mismatch between the two. The alternator needs to be spun fast to generate rated amperage, and the vacuum pump has a fairly conservative rpm limit to last a reasonable amount of time. With the two coupled together I didn't see how to resolve that issue, so I discarded the idea and decided to go all electric. One possibility though is to use the Mazda smog pump for vacuum. Its heavy, but very reliable, and cheap. Another possibility is to use the Izusu/Chevette vacuum pump (bolts to the rear of the Izusu/Chevette alternator). Its available through Izusu dealers for about $150. It weighs about 2-3 lbs. Mark S. >> For what its worth, I am using a early 80's diesel Chevy Chevette >> Alternator, with the vacuum pump attached to the rear.