Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: flyrotary Date: Sat, 31 May 2003 11:57:33 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mail.viclink.com ([66.129.220.6] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1b6) with ESMTP id 2369647 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 31 May 2003 11:03:14 -0400 Received: from viclink.com (p138.AS1.viclink.com [66.129.192.138]) by mail.viclink.com (8.11.7/8.11.7) with ESMTP id h4VF3eY50022 for ; Sat, 31 May 2003 08:03:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-Message-ID: <3ED8C35D.9030005@viclink.com> X-Original-Date: Sat, 31 May 2003 07:59:41 -0700 From: Perry Mick User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win95; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Aussie invention Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------000900030506040106010604" X-RAVMilter-Version: 8.4.3(snapshot 20030217) (mail.viclink.com) --------------000900030506040106010604 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit G Taylor wrote: > Hello all > > This is for Leon and anyone else who might be interested. I apologize > for this being along way off topic but could not help myself. > > Leon, go to website www.lutec.com.au to see > what your Queensland mates are doing. If this works the way they say > it does it will sure change the way we produce energy, and throw all > accepted scientific principles out on their ear. > > I can't wait to hear your comments. > > Your Canadian friends. > > Grant and Marg Taylor > Looks like a scam to me. No way you can charge a battery with a device that gets it's energy to operate from the same battery. Perpetual motion. Even if the electric water pump should work, what is the reason to use one? It would have to be less efficient. You are converting mechanical energy to electrical energy and then back to mechanical energy? There is going to be a loss at every conversion. So in the end you will be sapping more energy from your engine to power the water pump, power that could be going into your prop. Leon has promised us some scientific data, but it doesn't appear to be very scientific process since Leon already has his mind made up! Sorry Leon, just a bit sceptical, waiting for some test data.... -- Perry Mick Custom Composite Props mick@bridgingworlds.com http://www.ductedfan.com --------------000900030506040106010604 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

G Taylor wrote:

Hello all

This is for Leon and anyone else who might be interested. I apologize for this being along way off topic but could not help myself.

Leon, go to website www.lutec.com.au to see what your Queensland mates are doing. If this works the way they say it does it will sure change the way we produce energy, and throw all accepted scientific principles out on their ear.

I can't wait to hear your comments.

Your Canadian friends.

Grant and Marg Taylor

Looks like a scam to me. No way you can charge a battery with a device that gets it's energy to operate from the same battery. Perpetual motion.

Even if the electric water pump should work, what is the reason to use one? It would have to be less efficient. You are converting mechanical energy to electrical energy and then back to mechanical energy? There is going to be a loss at every conversion. So in the end you will be sapping more energy from your engine to power the water pump, power that could be going into your prop.

Leon has promised us some scientific data, but it doesn't appear to be very scientific process since Leon already has his mind made up! Sorry Leon, just a bit sceptical, waiting for some test data....

-- 
Perry Mick
Custom Composite Props
mick@bridgingworlds.com
http://www.ductedfan.com

--------------000900030506040106010604--