Return-Path: Received: from imf21aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.69] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c1) with ESMTP id 726411 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 13:58:42 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.69; envelope-from=sqpilot@bellsouth.net Received: from [209.214.45.129] by imf21aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.11 201-253-122-130-111-20040605) with ESMTP id <20050212185754.TXDS2069.imf21aec.mail.bellsouth.net@[209.214.45.129]> for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 13:57:54 -0500 Received: from 127.0.0.1 (AVG SMTP 7.0.300 [265.8.7]); Sat, 12 Feb 2005 12:57:44 -0600 Message-ID: <004c01c51134$bb64bc80$812dd6d1@paul52u7f5qyav> From: "Paul" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Vapor Lock Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 12:57:42 -0600 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=======AVGMAIL-420E51A8172C=======" --=======AVGMAIL-420E51A8172C======= Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0049_01C51102.70B00DC0" ------=_NextPart_000_0049_01C51102.70B00DC0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks for that info, Perry. Paul Conner ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Perry Mick=20 To: Rotary motors in aircraft=20 Sent: Saturday, February 12, 2005 8:12 AM Subject: [FlyRotary] Vapor Lock Hi, Perry....One question....Does your unburned fuel (from the fuel = rail) go back into your sump tank also? Or do you return the unused = fuel to one of your fuel tanks? If I were returning fuel to one of the = main tanks, I would think that venting the sump would be appropriate, = but since I am sending fuel undere pressure back into the sump tank, I = am concerned that once the sump tank is full, the additional fuel pumped = back into the sump tank would take the path of least resistance....out = the vent instead of back up the fuel line into the tank? Thanks for = your input. Paul Conner One other comment Paul: the fuel return from the fuel rail is not = pressurized. The pressure regulator maintains HP on the fuel rail side, = but the fuel return output back to the sump is not under high pressure. -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ----- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.7 - Release Date: 2/10/2005 ------=_NextPart_000_0049_01C51102.70B00DC0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks for that info, = Perry.   Paul=20 Conner
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Perry=20 Mick
Sent: Saturday, February 12, = 2005 8:12=20 AM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Vapor = Lock

Hi, Perry....One = question....Does=20 your unburned fuel (from the fuel rail) go back into your sump tank=20 also?   Or do you return the unused fuel to one of your fuel = tanks?  If I were returning fuel to one of the main tanks, I = would think=20 that venting the sump would be appropriate, but since I am sending = fuel undere=20 pressure back into the sump tank, I am concerned that once the sump = tank is=20 full, the additional fuel pumped back into the sump tank would take = the path=20 of least resistance....out the vent instead of back up the fuel line = into the=20 tank?   Thanks for your input.  Paul = Conner

One other comment Paul: the fuel return from the fuel = rail is=20 not pressurized. The pressure regulator maintains HP on the fuel rail = side,=20 but the fuel return output back to the sump is not under high=20 pressure.


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG=20 Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.7 - Release = Date:=20 2/10/2005
------=_NextPart_000_0049_01C51102.70B00DC0-- --=======AVGMAIL-420E51A8172C======= Content-Type: text/plain; x-avg=cert; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Content-Description: "AVG certification" No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.7 - Release Date: 2/10/2005 --=======AVGMAIL-420E51A8172C=======--