Return-Path: <tomtugan@yahoo.com>
Received: from web41526.mail.yahoo.com ([66.218.94.133] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c1)
  with SMTP id 724061 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 14:55:31 -0500
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.218.94.133; envelope-from=tomtugan@yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 98310 invoked by uid 60001); 10 Feb 2005 19:54:45 -0000
Message-ID: <20050210195445.98308.qmail@web41526.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [63.224.93.112] by web41526.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:54:45 PST
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:54:45 -0800 (PST)
From: Tom <tomtugan@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: : Same HP = Same Air Mass <> same air Velocity II  [FlyRotary] Re: Ellison, the missing piece
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
In-Reply-To: <list-724053@logan.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1834219177-1108065285=:98175"

--0-1834219177-1108065285=:98175
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

I asked that of myself after I posted and decided it had no real basis.  retracted
Tom

Tracy Crook <lors01@msn.com> wrote:
Doesn't prove anything conclusive, but in the SUN 100 race my NA 2nd gen 13B powered RV-4 did beat a bunch of 0 - 360 powered planes of the same type (RV-4s & 6s).   I think it is safe to say that a  *properly tuned*  13B of any generation will equal or exceed the power of an O - 360.  Where did your understanding come from?
 
FWIW, It is the definition of  *properly tuned* that we are really discussing here.
 
Tracy

It's my understanding that NA non-renesis rotary installations produce less power than 360s, Perry Mick might have a word on this. 

 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
--0-1834219177-1108065285=:98175
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii

<DIV>I asked that of myself after I posted and decided it had no real basis.&nbsp; retracted</DIV>
<DIV>Tom<BR><BR><B><I>Tracy Crook &lt;lors01@msn.com&gt;</I></B> wrote:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">
<STYLE></STYLE>

<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2523" name=GENERATOR><!--[gte IE 5]><?xml:namespace prefix="v" /><?xml:namespace prefix="o" /><![endif]-->
<DIV>
<DIV>Doesn't prove anything conclusive, but&nbsp;in the SUN 100 race my NA 2nd gen 13B&nbsp;powered RV-4&nbsp;did beat a bunch of 0 - 360 powered planes of the same type (RV-4s &amp; 6s).&nbsp;&nbsp; I think it is safe to say that a&nbsp; *properly tuned* &nbsp;13B of any generation will equal or exceed the power of an O - 360.&nbsp; Where did your understanding come from?</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>FWIW, It is the definition of&nbsp; *properly tuned* that we are really discussing here.</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Tracy<BR></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>It's my understanding that NA non-renesis rotary installations produce&nbsp;less power than 360s, Perry Mick might have a word on this. </DIV>
<DIV><BR>&nbsp;</DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE><p>__________________________________________________<br>Do You Yahoo!?<br>Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around <br>http://mail.yahoo.com 
--0-1834219177-1108065285=:98175--