I don't like divided runners and tuning the intake would be impossible. Why not use two throttle bodies? It is the most simple, straight forward intake possible. Jerry

On Wednesday, February 9, 2005, at 08:58 PM, Tom wrote:

Jerry,
Since only one rotor chamber is drawing fuel/air at any given time, why would you not feed them both from a single throttle body?
Tom

Jerry Hey <jerryhey@earthlink.net> wrote:

George, originally I was going to hook up with a piece of hose over the
butted pieces with a couple of hose clamps. That is how I will attach
the other end at the throttle bodies. But, we have been considering
welding and also building some type of flange. Certainly, for starters
I will use the hose and clamp method. Jerry





On Wednesday, February 9, 2005, at 08:43 PM, George Lendich wrote:

> Jerry,
> Is that a but weld, OR does the tube go into the  bellmouth end OR a
> flange that they both go into.
> George ( down under) 
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Jerry Hey
> To: Rotary motors in aircraft
> Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 9:35 AM
> Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: P port intake
>
> Yes, it is 1.61 inches.
>
>
> On Wednesday, February 9, 2005, at 05:39 PM, Tom wrote:
>
> Jerry,
> Do you have an i.d. measurement for the narrow end?
>  
> TIA
> Tom
>
> Jerry Hey wrote:
>
> Today UPS brought the bell mouths for the P port intake. They are
> three inches o.d. across and have a smooth gradual taper down to the
> runner size ...
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'
>

<image.tiff>

Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Easier than ever with enhanced search. Learn more.