Return-Path: Received: from smtpauth09.mail.atl.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.69] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c1) with ESMTP id 723088 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 22:19:37 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.69; envelope-from=jerryhey@earthlink.net Received: from [65.176.176.45] (helo=earthlink.net) by smtpauth09.mail.atl.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Cz4qx-0007yn-VC for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 22:18:53 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=simple; s=test1; d=earthlink.net; h=Date:Subject:Content-Type:Mime-Version:From:To:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:X-Mailer; b=iJpyjpw/9YRUFEE3oqJ+0i5XlcgnUg+JVo1Eig3JAoDfw6b4HfPpwzXTS704kz3o; Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 22:18:45 -0500 Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: P port intake Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-60-849307134 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v552) From: Jerry Hey To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <7957571C-7B12-11D9-96EB-0003931B0C7A@earthlink.net> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.552) X-ELNK-Trace: 8104856d7830ec6b1aa676d7e74259b7b3291a7d08dfec79e033dd485a9e4d9e7cfbd3cce1e79b33350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 65.176.176.45 --Apple-Mail-60-849307134 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed I don't like divided runners and tuning the intake would be impossible.=20= Why not use two throttle bodies? It is the most simple, straight=20 forward intake possible. Jerry On Wednesday, February 9, 2005, at 08:58 PM, Tom wrote: > Jerry, > Since only one rotor chamber is drawing fuel/air at any given time,=20 > why would you not feed them both from a single throttle body? > Tom > > Jerry Hey wrote: > > George, originally I was going to hook up with a piece of hose over = the > butted pieces with a couple of hose clamps. That is how I will attach > the other end at the throttle bodies. But, we have been considering > welding and also building some type of flange. Certainly, for starters > I will use the hose and clamp method. Jerry > > > > > > On Wednesday, February 9, 2005, at 08:43 PM, George Lendich wrote: > > > Jerry, > > Is that a but weld,=A0OR does the tube go into the=A0 bellmouth end = OR a > > flange that they both go into. > > George ( down under)=A0 > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Jerry Hey > > To: Rotary motors in aircraft > > Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 9:35 AM > > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: P port intake > > > > Yes, it is 1.61 inches. > > > > > > On Wednesday, February 9, 2005, at 05:39 PM, Tom wrote: > > > > Jerry, > > Do you have an i.d. measurement for the narrow end? > > =A0 > > TIA > > Tom > > > > Jerry Hey wrote: > > > > Today UPS brought the bell mouths for the P port intake. They are > > three inches o.d. across and have a smooth gradual taper down to the > > runner size ... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you Yahoo!? > > Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term' > > > > > > > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Mail - Easier than ever with enhanced search. Learn more.= --Apple-Mail-60-849307134 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/enriched; charset=ISO-8859-1 I don't like divided runners and tuning the intake would be impossible. Why not use two throttle bodies? It is the most simple, straight forward intake possible. Jerry On Wednesday, February 9, 2005, at 08:58 PM, Tom wrote: Jerry, Since only one rotor chamber is drawing fuel/air at any given time, why would you not feed them both from a single throttle body? Tom Jerry Hey < wrote: George, originally I was going to hook up with a piece of hose over the butted pieces with a couple of hose clamps. That is how I will attach the other end at the throttle bodies. But, we have been considering welding and also building some type of flange. Certainly, for starters I will use the hose and clamp method. Jerry On Wednesday, February 9, 2005, at 08:43 PM, George Lendich wrote: > Jerry, > Is that a but weld,=A0OR does the tube go into the=A0 bellmouth end OR = a > flange that they both go into. > George ( down under)=A0 > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Jerry Hey > To: Rotary motors in aircraft > Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 9:35 AM > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: P port intake > > Yes, it is 1.61 inches. > > > On Wednesday, February 9, 2005, at 05:39 PM, Tom wrote: > > Jerry, > Do you have an i.d. measurement for the narrow end? > =A0 > TIA > Tom > > Jerry Hey wrote: > > Today UPS brought the bell mouths for the P port intake. They are > three inches o.d. across and have a smooth gradual taper down to the > runner size ... > > > >=20 > > > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term' > < Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Easier than ever with enhanced search. 1999,1999,FFFFLearn = more.= --Apple-Mail-60-849307134--