Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Received: from [65.33.166.167] (account <marv@lancaironline.net>)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.0b8)
  with HTTP id 1797335 for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>; Thu, 03 Oct 2002 19:38:39 -0400
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: dynamic balancing
To: flyrotary
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro Web Mailer v.4.0b8
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2002 19:38:39 -0400
Message-ID: <web-1797335@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <3D9CCF92.E51E1345@verizon.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Posted for Rick Girard <fly.ez@verizon.net>:

Marv,  I did my engine because even though I have zero experience with rotary
engines I have done it on recips and it makes a dramatic difference. Like 
being
too rich or too thin, you can never be too smooth, it's just efficiency you're
throwing away.  My two cents.

Rick Girard


[Thanks for the data point.  I'm now thinking seriously towards having it 
done, considering that I've replaced the e-shaft and had the rotors coated 
things aren't as they were back on the day that the engine was taken apart.

           <Marv>                   ]