Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=165.166.0.28; envelope-from=bjspencer@blomand.net
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 17:21:33 -0600
From: joe spencer <bjspencer@blomand.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: water cooled matrix in oil pan
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Message-id: <000901c4fa8f$ca5a4f40$7b584ace@computer>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
References: <list-607644@logan.com>

Tracy Crook used the oil pan water system once. I believe he stopped using
it ...........Joe
----- Original Message -----
From: "Wynn Mike" <mike.wynn@spectra-physics.com>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2005 4:24 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: water cooled matrix in oil pan


>
> `The problem with this is that the oil is essentially stagnant in the pan'
>
> Al, this is only 'cause you haven't looked inside when its running -
there's
> an oil pump driving this stuff round the engine all the time, it just
starts
> and finishes at the bottom of the oil pan.  The flow rate will be the same
> as anywhere else on the system that you would choose to oil/air cooler.
Its
> true that the `dwell time' in the oil pan will be longer as this is your
> reservoir but this is a good thing.
>
> One can discuss the merits of a (hot) water to (hotter) oil heat
exchanger,
> but that's a different question and one where I have no experience.  They
> are used on cars a lot but I don't know about their efficiency for
> continuous high power operation.
>
>
> Mike
> Nice moose Kevin
>
> >>  Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
> >>  Archive:   http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html