|
And, is 4/6 the combined number of intake/exhaust ports or count of intake
ports only??
Thanks
Tom
--- Ken Welter <rotary.coot@verizon.net> wrote:
> >In a message dated 1/7/2005 7:10:50 PM Central Standard Time,
> >atlasyts@bellsouth.net writes:
> >
> ><< On 1/7/05 8:05 PM, "Paul" <sqpilot@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> >
> > > I need to query the group....which might be the best choice of engines
> >(going
> > > non-turbo)....a street ported 4-port with high compression rotors, or a
> >street
> > > ported NA 6 port with high compression rotors? I could do it either
> > > way....just don't know if one has advantages over the other. Thanks in
> > > advance for all input and suggestions. Paul Conner
> > >
> > >
> > > Third Gen. Turbo :)
> > > Bulent
> >
> >The 4 port is it for power hands down.
> >
> >Lynn E. Hanover
> >
>
>
> How much more power at 6500 rpm do you think a third gen 4 port
> with NA rotors would have over a 6 port ???
> Ken Welter
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Meet the all-new My Yahoo! - Try it today!
http://my.yahoo.com
|
|