Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #14997
From: Tom <tomtugan@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: which engine
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 19:09:35 -0800 (PST)
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
And,  is 4/6 the combined number of intake/exhaust ports or count of intake
ports only??

Thanks
Tom


--- Ken Welter <rotary.coot@verizon.net> wrote:

> >In a message dated 1/7/2005 7:10:50 PM Central Standard Time,
> >atlasyts@bellsouth.net writes:
> >
> ><< On 1/7/05 8:05 PM, "Paul" <sqpilot@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> >
> >  > I need to query the group....which might be the best choice of engines
> >(going
> >  > non-turbo)....a street ported 4-port with high compression rotors, or a
> >street
> >  > ported NA 6 port with high compression rotors?  I could do it either
> >  > way....just don't know if one has advantages over the other.  Thanks in
> >  > advance for all input and suggestions.  Paul Conner
> >  >
> >  >
> >  > Third Gen. Turbo :)
> >  > Bulent
> >
> >The 4 port is it for power hands down.
> >
> >Lynn E. Hanover
> >
>
>
>     How much more power at 6500 rpm do you think a third gen 4 port
> with NA rotors would have over a 6 port ???
>    Ken Welter




__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Meet the all-new My Yahoo! - Try it today!
http://my.yahoo.com
 

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster