Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.218.93.85; envelope-from=tomtugan@yahoo.com
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  b=X9kAfA99lxXnC99HrNJ0yFVE8pXJiHKEO417/BIABnFTYpVH9/xxqYN88dIyrGzLuW7mCyYcv4Eu2aEX9u6iz8RqWmKv82fxBAE6FsD0/5Acz+LiopDWbUdD6rJ751QCCW47SOFdlSwQ02khJAGI9RjdP/k0yiQ49jogFtTmM0U=  ;
Message-ID: <20050109030935.36483.qmail@web41502.mail.yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 19:09:35 -0800 (PST)
From: Tom <tomtugan@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: which engine
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
In-Reply-To: <list-596190@logan.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

And,  is 4/6 the combined number of intake/exhaust ports or count of intake
ports only??

Thanks
Tom


--- Ken Welter <rotary.coot@verizon.net> wrote:

> >In a message dated 1/7/2005 7:10:50 PM Central Standard Time,
> >atlasyts@bellsouth.net writes:
> >
> ><< On 1/7/05 8:05 PM, "Paul" <sqpilot@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> >
> >  > I need to query the group....which might be the best choice of engines
> >(going
> >  > non-turbo)....a street ported 4-port with high compression rotors, or a
> >street
> >  > ported NA 6 port with high compression rotors?  I could do it either
> >  > way....just don't know if one has advantages over the other.  Thanks in
> >  > advance for all input and suggestions.  Paul Conner
> >  >
> >  >
> >  > Third Gen. Turbo :)
> >  > Bulent
> >
> >The 4 port is it for power hands down.
> >
> >Lynn E. Hanover
> >
> 
> 
>     How much more power at 6500 rpm do you think a third gen 4 port 
> with NA rotors would have over a 6 port ???
>    Ken Welter


__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Meet the all-new My Yahoo! - Try it today! 
http://my.yahoo.com