Return-Path: Received: from out006.verizon.net ([206.46.170.106] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.5) with ESMTP id 596198 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 08 Jan 2005 20:01:08 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=206.46.170.106; envelope-from=rotary.coot@verizon.net Received: from [65.239.57.9] ([65.239.57.190]) by out006.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.06 201-253-122-130-106-20030910) with ESMTP id <20050109010037.ZWTD7873.out006.verizon.net@[65.239.57.9]> for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 19:00:37 -0600 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: res0c5l1@incoming.verizon.net Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 17:05:59 -0800 To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" From: Ken Welter Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: which engine Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="============_-1106889723==_ma============" X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out006.verizon.net from [65.239.57.190] at Sat, 8 Jan 2005 19:00:35 -0600 --============_-1106889723==_ma============ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" >In a message dated 1/7/2005 7:10:50 PM Central Standard Time, >atlasyts@bellsouth.net writes: > ><< On 1/7/05 8:05 PM, "Paul" wrote: > > > I need to query the group....which might be the best choice of engines >(going > > non-turbo)....a street ported 4-port with high compression rotors, or a >street > > ported NA 6 port with high compression rotors? I could do it either > > way....just don't know if one has advantages over the other. Thanks in > > advance for all input and suggestions. Paul Conner > > > > > > Third Gen. Turbo :) > > Bulent > >The 4 port is it for power hands down. > >Lynn E. Hanover > How much more power at 6500 rpm do you think a third gen 4 port with NA rotors would have over a 6 port ??? Ken Welter --============_-1106889723==_ma============ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" [FlyRotary] Re: which engine
In a message dated 1/7/2005 7:10:50 PM Central Standard Time,
atlasyts@bellsouth.net writes:

<< On 1/7/05 8:05 PM, "Paul" <sqpilot@bellsouth.net> wrote:
 
 > I need to query the group....which might be the best choice of engines
(going
 > non-turbo)....a street ported 4-port with high compression rotors, or a
street
 > ported NA 6 port with high compression rotors?  I could do it either
 > way....just don't know if one has advantages over the other.  Thanks in
 > advance for all input and suggestions.  Paul Conner
 >
 >
 > Third Gen. Turbo :)
 > Bulent
 
The 4 port is it for power hands down.
Lynn E. Hanover
 


   How much more power at 6500 rpm do you think a third gen 4 port with NA rotors would have over a 6 port ???
  Ken Welter
--============_-1106889723==_ma============--