Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: flyrotary Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 22:45:28 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from smtp800.mail.sc5.yahoo.com ([66.163.168.179] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1b3) with SMTP id 2131788 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 16 Apr 2003 22:39:12 -0400 Received: from adsl-216-63-104-151.dsl.bumttx.swbell.net (HELO Davidscmptr) (dcarter11@sbcglobal.net@216.63.104.151 with login) by smtp-sbc-v1.mail.vip.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 17 Apr 2003 02:39:11 -0000 X-Original-Message-ID: <014201c3048a$7f50b720$6401a8c0@ip.net> Reply-To: "David Carter" From: "David Carter" X-Original-To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: fuel return X-Original-Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 21:38:57 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Hmmm, I don't understand something (actually, a lot of things), but, if your engine sucks 16gph at full power at sea level on a cold day (worst case for max flow), and your high pressure fuel injection pump puts out max anticipated flow plus (what? 25%, 50%, like in the Canadian static fuel flow drain checks?), then: - If that pump output is 16 + 8 gph or 24 gph, then, does it put out 24 gph when you are at idle on the ground (or at idle decending from 10,000 feet) with the engine burning maybe 2 gph, so that 24-2 =22gph is being bypassed by the fuel rail's regulator back to the header or tank being fed from? If so, then the return line could be about as big as the main feed line. Except, so what if the return line is smaller? - The bypass fuel will be restricted by the smaller return line and may not allow 24gph. That shouldn't cause any problem, unless the pump is working harder/being loaded harder and maybe drawing more current. David Carter ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marvin Kaye" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2003 7:20 AM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: fuel return > Posted for "Ed Anderson" : > > Hi John, > > I used 3/8" line simply because I had that size, however, since that is > also the size of the main fuel line a 3/8" line for return is clearly > oversize and I would think a 1/4" dia line would do just fine. I return my > line to the top of my sump tank. I have two plates in the sump with many > small holes to prevent the fuel from splashing into the sump and creating > bubbles (probably not needed). Both of my fuel pumps draw from the bottom > of the sump tank (each with its own fitting). > > Ed > > > Ed; How large a fuel line does one need for the return line to the fuel > > tank? I'm in the process of welding the fittings into the fuel tank. > Also > > where is the best place to return the fuel?, do you return it to the top > or > > bottom of the tank? The fuel outlet on the Tailwind is in the center > > bottom, with the tank located behind the control panel. > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >