Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: flyrotary Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 01:12:17 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [65.54.169.126] (HELO hotmail.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1b3) with ESMTP id 2130730 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 16 Apr 2003 00:48:23 -0400 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Tue, 15 Apr 2003 21:48:21 -0700 Received: from 65.137.50.111 by bay3-dav96.bay3.hotmail.com with DAV; Wed, 16 Apr 2003 04:48:20 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [65.137.50.111] X-Originating-Email: [lors01@msn.com] From: "Tracy Crook" X-Original-To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] exhaust X-Original-Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 00:48:27 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: MSN Mail 8.00.0022.3100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V8.00.0022.3100 X-Original-Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Apr 2003 04:48:21.0158 (UTC) FILETIME=[67D63460:01C303D3] > Tracy; I need to order the SS for the exhaust system, JC Whitneys has the 1 > 3/4' SS in 304. Is this the tubing i'm looking for. Also should I be > looking for a turbo to use for a muffler? On the list here it seems the > exhaust is somewhat a nightmare to tone down, and turbos generally take a > lot of the bark out of exhaust. JohnD > I'd go with 321 stainless. A turbo will reduce the bark of the exhaust but that alone is a very bad reason for installing a turbo. Turbo installation difficulty is vastly underestimated. Using the non-turbo rotor housings with the exhaust port splitters is a lot easier & lighter way to reduce exhaust bark. Tracy Crook